Cardiology>>>>>Ischaemic heart disease
Question 11#

 One of your patients has discrete angiographically significant lesions in the mid right coronary artery and the mid left anterior descending coronary artery. He is 60 years old and is not diabetic. He has ongoing class 2 anginal symptoms despite optimal dose of a beta-blocker and a long-acting nitrate.

What do you recommend?

A. CABG will be associated with a greater mortality benefit compared with PCI
B. The risk of stroke will be significantly lower with PCI
C. Add a third oral antianginal and then reconsider revascularization
D. The likelihood of repeat revascularization is higher with PCI
E. Revascularization is recommended for prognostic reasons

Correct Answer is D

Comment:

The benefits of revascularization and the comparison of modalities depend on the patient’s background and coronary anatomy. With this anatomy revascularization is for symptoms and not prognosis. Both modalities are equally effective in this respect. Revascularization should be considered for stable angina refractory to two oral antianginals in preference to a third agent. The risk of stroke is similar. Although PCI has the advantage of rapid recovery, the probability of repeat revascularization is statistically higher.